https://voiceofhindus.org/wp-content/plugins/twentytwentyseven/

{juzi1}

online casino free sign up bonus
online casino free sign up bonus What Data Does a VPN Actually Hide?

The long sports-filled Thanksgiving weekend is a time when many Americans enjoy gathering with friends and family for good food, good company and hopefully not too much political conversation. Also on the menu — all the NFL and college sports you can handle. Here's a roadmap to one of the biggest sports weekends of the year, with a look at marquee games over the holiday and how to watch. All times are in EST. All odds are by BetMGM Sportsbook. • NFL: There is a triple-header lined up for pro football fans. Chicago at Detroit, 12:30 p.m., CBS: Rookie quarterback Caleb Williams and the Bears go against the Lions, who are one of the favorites to reach the Super Bowl in February. Lions favored by 10. New York at Dallas, 4:30 p.m., Fox: The Giants and Cowboys are both suffering through miserable seasons and are now using backup quarterbacks for different reasons. But if Dallas can figure out a way to win, it will still be on the fringe of the playoff race. Cowboys favored by 3 1/2. Miami at Green Bay, 8:20 p.m., NBC/Peacock: The Packers stumbled slightly out of the gate but have won six of their past seven games. They'll need a win against Miami to try to keep pace in the NFC North. Packers favored by 3. • College Football: Memphis at No. 18 Tulane, 7:30 p.m., ESPN. If college football is your jam, this is a good warmup for a big weekend. The Tigers try to ruin the Green Wave’s perfect record in the American Athletic Conference. Tulane is favored by 14. Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes works in the pocket against the Carolina Panthers during the first half of Sunday's game in Charlotte, N.C. • NFL: A rare Friday showdown features the league-leading Chiefs. Las Vegas at Kansas City, 3 p.m. Prime Video: The Chiefs and quarterback Patrick Mahomes are 12-point favorites over the Raiders. • College Basketball: Some of the top programs meet in holiday tournaments around the country. Battle 4 Atlantis championship, 5:30 p.m., ESPN: One of the premier early season tournaments, the eight-team field includes No. 3 Gonzaga, No. 14 Indiana and No. 24 Arizona. Rady Children's Invitational, 6 p.m., Fox: It's the championship game for a four-team field that includes No. 13 Purdue and No. 23 Mississippi. • College Football: There is a full slate of college games to dig into. Oregon State at No. 11 Boise State, noon, Fox: The Broncos try to stay in the College Football Playoff hunt when they host the Beavers. Boise State favored by 19 1/2. Oklahoma State at No. 23 Colorado, noon, ABC: The Buffaloes and Coach Prime are still in the hunt for the Big 12 championship game when they host the Cowboys. Colorado favored by 16 1/2. Georgia Tech at No. 6 Georgia, 7:30 p.m., ABC: The Bulldogs are on pace for a spot in the CFP but host what could be a tricky game against rival Georgia Tech. Georgia favored by 19 1/2. • NBA. After taking Thanksgiving off, pro basketball returns. Oklahoma City at Los Angeles Lakers, 10 p.m., ESPN: The Thunder look like one of the best teams in the NBA's Western Conference. They'll host Anthony Davis, LeBron James and the Lakers. Los Angeles Lakers forward LeBron James dunks during the first half of a Nov. 23 game against the Denver Nuggets in Los Angeles. • College Football. There are more matchups with playoff implications. Michigan at No. 2 Ohio State, noon, Fox: The Wolverines are struggling one season after winning the national title. They could make their fan base a whole lot happier with an upset of the Buckeyes. Ohio State favored by 21. No. 7 Tennessee at Vanderbilt, noon, ABC: The Volunteers are a fairly big favorite and have dominated this series, but the Commodores have been a tough team this season and already have achieved a monumental upset over Alabama. Tennessee favored by 11. No. 16 South Carolina at No. 12 Clemson, noon, ESPN: The Palmetto State rivals are both hanging on the edge of the CFP playoff race. A win — particularly for Clemson — would go a long way toward clinching its spot in the field. Clemson favored by 2 1/2. No. 3 Texas at No. 20 Texas A&M, 7:30 p.m. ABC: The Aggies host their in-state rival for the first time since 2011 after the Longhorns joined the SEC. Texas favored by 5 1/2. Washington at No. 1 Oregon, 7:30 p.m., NBC: The top-ranked Ducks have been one of the nation’s best teams all season. They’ll face the Huskies, who would love a marquee win in coach Jedd Fisch’s first season. Oregon favored by 19 1/2. • NBA: A star-studded clash is part of the league's lineup. Golden State at Phoenix, 9 p.m., NBA TV: Steph Curry and the Warriors are set to face the Suns' Big Three of Kevin Durant, Devin Booker and Bradley Beal. • NFL: It's Sunday, that says it all. Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, 1 p.m., CBS: Joe Burrow is having a great season for the Bengals, who are struggling in other areas. They need a win to stay in the playoff race, hosting a Steelers team that's 8-3 and won five of their past six. Bengals favored by 3. Arizona at Minnesota, 1 p.m., Fox: The Cardinals are tied for the top of the NFC West while the Vikings are 9-2 and have been one of the biggest surprises of the season with journeyman Sam Darnold under center. Vikings favored by 3 1/2. Philadelphia at Baltimore, 4:25 p.m., CBS: Two of the league's most electric players will be on the field when Saquon Barkley and the Eagles travel to face Lamar Jackson and the Ravens. Ravens favored by 3. San Francisco at Buffalo, 8:20 p.m. NBC/Peacock: The 49ers try to get back to .500 against the Bills, who have won six straight. Bills favored by 7. • NBA. The best teams in the Eastern Conference meet in a statement game. Boston at Cleveland, 6 p.m., NBA TV: The defending champion Celtics travel to face the Cavs, who won their first 15 games to start the season. • Premier League: English soccer fans have a marquee matchup. Manchester City at Liverpool, 11 a.m., USA Network/Telemundo. The two top teams meet with Manchester City trying to shake off recent struggles. • Auto Racing: The F1 season nears its conclusion. F1 Qatar Grand Prix, 11 a.m., ESPN2 – It's the penultimate race of the season. Max Verstappen already has clinched his fourth consecutive season championship. Before the 2023 National Football League season started, it seemed inevitable that Bill Belichick would end his career as the winningest head coach in league history. He had won six Super Bowls with the New England Patriots and 298 regular-season games, plus 31 playoff games, across his career. Then the 2023 season happened. Belichick's Patriots finished 4-13, the franchise's worst record since 1992. At the end of the year, Belichick and New England owner Robert Kraft agreed to part ways. And now, during the 2024 season, Belichick is on the sideline. He's 26 wins from the #1 spot, a mark he'd reach in little more than two seasons if he maintained his .647 career winning percentage. Will he ascend the summit? It's hard to tell. Belichick would be 73 if he graced the sidelines next season—meaning he'd need to coach until at least 75 to break the all-time mark. Only one other NFL coach has ever helmed a team at age 73: Romeo Crennel in 2020 for the Houston Texans. With Belichick's pursuit of history stalled, it's worth glancing at the legends who have reached the pinnacle of coaching success. Who else stands among the 10 winningest coaches in NFL history? Stacker ranked the coaches with the most all-time regular-season wins using data from Pro Football Reference . These coaches have combined for 36 league championships, which represents 31.6% of all championships won throughout the history of pro football. To learn who made the list, keep reading. You may also like: Ranking the biggest NFL Draft busts of the last 30 years - Seasons coached: 23 - Years active: 1981-2003 - Record: 190-165-2 - Winning percentage: .535 - Championships: 0 Dan Reeves reached the Super Bowl four times—thrice with the Denver Broncos and once with the Atlanta Falcons—but never won the NFL's crown jewel. Still, he racked up nearly 200 wins across his 23-year career, including a stint in charge of the New York Giants, with whom he won Coach of the Year in 1993. In all his tenures, he quickly built contenders—the three clubs he coached were a combined 17-31 the year before Reeves joined and 28-20 in his first year. However, his career ended on a sour note as he was fired from a 3-10 Falcons team after Week 14 in 2003. - Seasons coached: 23 - Years active: 1969-91 - Record: 193-148-1 - Winning percentage: .566 - Championships: 4 Chuck Noll's Pittsburgh Steelers were synonymous with success in the 1970s. Behind his defense, known as the Steel Curtain, and offensive stars, including Terry Bradshaw, Franco Harris, and Lynn Swann, Noll led the squad to four Super Bowl victories from 1974 to 1979. Noll's Steelers remain the lone team to win four Super Bowls in six years, though Andy Reid and Kansas City could equal that mark if they win the Lombardi Trophy this season. Noll was elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1993, two years after retiring. His legacy of coaching success has carried on in Pittsburgh—the club has had only two coaches (Bill Cowher and Mike Tomlin) since Noll retired. - Seasons coached: 21 - Years active: 1984-98, 2001-06 - Record: 200-126-1 - Winning percentage: .613 - Championships: 0 As head coach of Cleveland, Kansas City, Washington, and San Diego, Marty Schottenheimer proved a successful leader during the regular season. Notably, he was named Coach of the Year after turning around his 4-12 Chargers team to a 12-4 record in 2004. His teams, however, struggled during the playoffs. Schottheimer went 5-13 in the postseason, and he never made it past the conference championship round. As such, the Pennsylvania-born skipper is the winningest NFL coach never to win a league championship. - Seasons coached: 25 - Years active: 1946-62, '68-75 - Record: 213-104-9 - Winning percentage: .672 - Championships: 7 The only coach on this list to pilot a college team, Paul Brown, reached the pro ranks after a three-year stint at Ohio State and two years with the Navy during World War II. He guided the Cleveland Browns—named after Brown, their first coach—to four straight titles in the fledgling All-America Football Conference. After the league folded, the ballclub moved to the NFL in 1950, and Cleveland continued its winning ways, with Brown leading the team to championships in '50, '54, and '55. He was fired in 1963 but returned in 1968 as the co-founder and coach of the Cincinnati Bengals. His other notable accomplishments include helping to invent the face mask and breaking pro football's color barrier . - Seasons coached: 33 - Years active: 1921-53 - Record: 226-132-22 - Winning percentage: .631 - Championships: 6 An early stalwart of the NFL, Curly Lambeau spent 29 years helming the Green Bay Packers before wrapping up his coaching career with two-year stints with the Chicago Cardinals and Washington. His Packers won titles across three decades, including the league's first three-peat from 1929-31. Notably, he experienced only one losing season during his first 27 years with Green Bay, cementing his legacy of consistent success. Born in Green Bay, Lambeau co-founded the Packers and played halfback on the team from 1919-29. He was elected to the Hall of Fame as a coach and owner in 1963, two years before his death. You may also like: Countries with the most active NFL players - Seasons coached: 26 - Years active: 1999-present - Record: 267-145-1 - Winning percentage: .648 - Championships: 3 The only active coach in the top 10, Andy Reid has posted successful runs with both the Philadelphia Eagles and Kansas City. After reaching the Super Bowl once in 14 years with the Eagles, Reid ratcheted things up with K.C., winning three titles since 2019. As back-to-back defending champions, Reid and Co. are looking this season to become the first franchise to three-peat in the Super Bowl era and the third to do so in NFL history after the Packers of 1929-31 and '65-67. Time will tell if Reid and his offensive wizardry can lead Kansas City to that feat. - Seasons coached: 29 - Years active: 1991-95, 2000-23 - Record: 302-165 - Winning percentage: .647 - Championships: 6 The most successful head coach of the 21st century, Bill Belichick first coached the Cleveland Browns before taking over the New England Patriots in 2000. With the Pats, Belichick combined with quarterback Tom Brady to win six Super Bowls in 18 years. Belichick and New England split after last season when the Patriots went 4-13—the worst record of Belichick's career. His name has swirled around potential coaching openings , but nothing has come of it. Belichick has remained in the media spotlight with his regular slot on the "Monday Night Football" ManningCast. - Seasons coached: 33 - Years active: 1963-95 - Record: 328-156-6 - Winning percentage: .677 - Championships: 2 The winningest head coach in NFL history is Don Shula, who first coached the Baltimore Colts (losing Super Bowl III to Joe Namath and the New York Jets) for seven years before leading the Miami Dolphins for 26 seasons. With the Fins, Shula won back-to-back Super Bowls in 1972 and 1973, a run that included a 17-0 season—the only perfect campaign in NFL history. He also coached quarterback great Dan Marino in the 1980s and '90s, but the pair made it to a Super Bowl just once. Shula was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 1997. Story editing by Mike Taylor. Copy editing by Robert Wickwire. Photo selection by Lacy Kerrick. You may also like: The 5 biggest upsets of the 2023-24 NFL regular season Get local news delivered to your inbox!Stockhead Don't miss out on the headlines from Stockhead. Followed categories will be added to My News. GT1 secures LOI with Export Development Canada for up to C$100m funding Seymour project in line to become Ontario’s lithium producer Financing arrangements to be finalised in 2025 Special Report: Green Technology Metals has secured a letter of interest from Export Development Canada to potentially provide up to C$100 million in project financing for the company’s Seymour lithium project. It’s a significant show of support from Canadian authorities for what would be the first lithium mine in the province of Ontario and second in the country after Sayona and Piedmont’s North American Lithium site in Quebec. Seymour contains a JORC 2012 resource of 10.3Mt at 1.03% Li2O, but including the nearby Root project, GT1 boasts 24.9Mt at 1.13% Li2O. Exploration could grow the bounty further, with recent drilling returning high grade results from Despard, a prospect 20km east of Seymour. EDC, a self-sustaining financial crown corporation owned by the Government of Canada, specialises in providing financing solutions for Canadian exporters. The letter of interest includes potentially providing a direct lending debt funding package of up to C$100 million, and complements strong interest from other global commercial lenders along with some C$5.47m ($6.05m) already secured in Canadian government infrastructure funding for road and bridge upgrades. The company says this all amounts to a robust foundation for a diversified financing structure, solidifies the project’s role in Canada’s critical minerals supply chain and reinforces Seymour’s trajectory to become Ontario’s first lithium producer. Work is currently underway on a definitive feasibility study, with an investment decision due early in 2025 alongside permitting and approvals. Final investment decision next year The potential financing by EDC is contingent upon the successful completion of its rigorous due diligence process, including an environmental and social review, securing all necessary internal approvals and meeting typical project finance conditions. Green Technology Metals (ASX:GT1) is committed to advancing discussions as part of its financing strategy for Seymour, which will proceed in parallel with ongoing Indigenous consultation, permitting approvals and the project reaching a final investment decision, with completion expected in 2025. “This marks the first step in our financing strategy for the Seymour project development and we’re pleased to have achieved this milestone in 2024,” GT1 managing director Cameron Henry said. “EDC’s support potentially increases sourcing flexibility, greater access to low-cost direct lending and is non-dilutive to GT1 shareholders. “We continue to engage with global commercial lenders as part of our broader financing efforts, but the strong indication of interest from EDC validates the robustness of the Seymour project and further reinforces our strategy to become Ontario’s first lithium producer. “As a Canadian company, EDC’s potential support highlights the Seymour project’s significance to Canada’s critical minerals strategy. “Additionally, Government backing provides significantly lower cost of capital than traditional debt financing and demonstrates additional confidence in clean lithium technology.” On the path towards production “Looking ahead to 2025, GT1 is well-positioned with world-class partners, a solid financing framework and exciting project developments that bolster our confidence in continuing to advance our Ontario strategy,” Henry said. “We look forward to working with EDC and progressing with the due diligence and approval process.” The company is continuing its maiden drilling at the ~109km2 Junior lithium project – picked up last year – in the belief that it will deliver long-term feed to the planned Seymour concentrator. The first four holes have been returned from a 6900m maiden diamond drilling campaign, with a best hit of 18.7m at 1.39% Li2O just 8m deep at Despard – a 700m long target – demonstrating its potential as a third resource hub. This article does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions. Originally published as Green Technology Metals scores potential C$100m financing for Seymour More related stories Stockhead Road to 2025: RCE Sarah Hughan explores Recce Pharmaceuticals and a series of successes advancing a new class of synthetic anti-infectives. Read more Stockhead The year crypto went mainstream The crypto market has entered a new era of growth and mainstream adoption, with 2024 representing a significant turning point, writes James Quinn-Kumar. Read more

Authored by Jeff Carlson & Hans Mahncke via Truth Over News , Last week we wrote about the central role Obama played in establishing the Russiagate Hoax. This week we’re going to take a closer look at why Obama was so involved. What drove him to push a hoax that had been ostensibly put into place by the Clinton campaign? Many are aware of Biden’s entanglements in Ukraine but most are unaware of Obama’s implicit involvement . For some time now it's been our working theory that Russiagate originated, at least in part, as the result of what Joe Biden was doing in Ukraine - and as a result of Obama’s knowledge of Biden’s actions. Recall that Biden’s involvement in Ukraine traces back to at least early 2014 when he was pulled into the U.S. overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically-held elections by Victoria Nuland, the assistant secretary for European and Eurasian affairs in the Obama State Department. In November 2013, Ukraine’s president Yanukovych turned down a U.S.-backed trade deal with the European Union in favor of an emergency bailout from Russia, a decision which was understandable from Ukraine’s perspective but one which Nuland and her state department colleagues found deeply upsetting. When the European Union pursued a diplomatic route at resolving the impasse by proposing a power sharing agreement, Nuland was quick to veto the idea, telling Pyatt in a leaked phone call, “[expletive] the EU.” During that same call , Nuland discussed her plans for the ouster of Yanukovych and the installation of opposition leader Arseniy Yatsenyuk as prime minister. Towards the end of their conversation, Nuland noted that Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan had informed her that “you need Biden,” and she concluded by telling Pyatt that “Biden’s willing.” Biden was effectively appointed as the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine in February 2014. On Feb. 22, 2014, just as Nuland had planned, Yanukovych was removed as president of Ukraine and, three days later, Yatsenyuk, the candidate favored by Nuland, was installed as prime minister. In other words, the U.S. government had effectively enabled a coup that ousted a democratically elected leader and replaced him with their own candidate. The US-led ouster of Yanukovich also had other internal repercussions, most notably the outbreak of an eight-year civil war between western Ukraine and the Russian-speaking Donbass region of Ukraine. The idea that any of this could have been done without the direct approval from Obama, is of course, ridiculous. One of the members of Yanukovych’s government who lost his position in government as a result of the coup was Mykola Zlochevsky, the Oligarch owner of Burisma Energy. He had first served as minister of ecology and natural resources and later as deputy secretary for economic and social security. During his tenure in government, Zlochevsky’s companies, particularly Burisma, reportedly received an unusually large number of permits to extract oil and gas. In April 2014, UK prosecutors seized $23.5 million in assets owned by Zlochevsky that were held at a London bank, alleging that Zlochevsky had engaged in criminal conduct in Ukraine. It was at this same time that Burisma appointed Biden’s son, Hunter, and his close associate, Devin Archer to its board of directors. On April 21, 2014, Joe Biden traveled to Ukraine, offering not only his political support, but also $50 million in aid for Ukraine’s shaky new government. During Joe’s Ukraine visit, on April 22, it was announced that Archer had suddenly joined the board of Burisma. Hunter had also joined Burisma’s board that same month , but curiously Burisma didn’t announce Hunter’s appointment until May 12, 2014—after his father’s visit to Ukraine had concluded. Many have portrayed Hunter’s involvement as little more than a means for the Biden family to extract hefty board fees from Burisma for association with the Biden name. While there is likely a large amount of truth to this, we also suspect something bigger may have been at play—the effective capture of Ukraine’s natural gas assets. In a June 23, 2014 proposal from Boies Schiller, the law firm that employed Hunter, Burisma was provided with what Boies Schiller termed a “Strategic Outline for Legal Defense Plan.” Their proposal stated that they wanted to “Insulate Burisma from politically motivated disruptions in operations , including legal challenges to licenses, now and in the future.” The proposal from Boies Schiller was referring to the natural gas licenses that had been illegally accumulated by Zlochevsky during his time in the Ukrainian government. As part of this strategy, Boies wanted to “Meet with the U.S. officials in Washington, DC who are leading U.S. policy related to Ukraine to brief them on who Burisma is, its significance to the future of Ukraine, and the Investigation in order to seek their advice and assistance.” The proposal noted that “we are starting the process of creating an echo-chamber of U.S. officials discussing Burisma between and amongst themselves and encouraging each other to meet with Burisma.” Boies disclosed in their proposal that they had already spoken to a number of congressional members and their staff, including Senator Chris Murphy and his chief of staff. Amos Hochstein, Obama’s U.S. Special Envoy for International Energy , was also mentioned in the Boies proposal - which focused on establishing a meeting between Hochstein and Burisma’s CFO Vadym Pozharskyi in the coming month of July 2014. It appears that meeting never happened - although Hochstein did meet with Burisma lobbyist David Leiter and Boies law partner Heather King. Meanwhile, efforts by Hunter continued. In a November 2014 email, Hunter told his long-time money-man Eric Schwerin to "Pls send D Amos' contact info... Amos is 'Acting Special Envoy, Bureau of energy Resources' at State." What is clear from these documents is that Hunter and Archer were working to bring in high-level political support for Burisma from members of Congress and officials in the Obama administration at a time when it was very clear that Burisma was run by a corrupt Ukrainian Oligarch. And all of that support appeared to be centering around protecting the natural gas assets of Burisma. We’ve written a number of times on Joe Biden’s efforts to get Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin removed so we won’t rehash that entire story here. But it’s worth noting that it may have been around the sequence of events leading to Shokin’s firing that Obama may have become alarmed. The level of involvement from Obama officials would only accelerate in 2015 after the Bidens were further pulled into the legal entanglements of Burisma , which was under ongoing investigations into the theft of Ukraine’s natural gas assets. After receiving a new demand for help in ending the investigations into Burisma from Zlochevsky on November 2, 2015, Hunter immediately reached out to the previously-mentioned Hochstein. Hunter would meet in-person with Hochstein four days later, on November 6, 2015. Hochstein later reluctantly (and evasively) told congressional investigators that Hunter “wanted to know my views on Burisma and Zlochevsky.” Hochstein, who was Obama’s U.S. Special Envoy for International Energy at the time, privately expressed his concerns about Hunter’s role at Burisma to Joe Biden in October 2015 and again during a flight to Ukraine on December 7, 2015. We’ve mentioned Hochstein a number of times for a reason. Hochstein had been appointed by Obama to “help Ukraine, and other European countries, find new supplies of natural gas after Russia invaded” Crimea in 2014 . Hochstein “also worked on energy issues related to sanctions on Iran and Russia” and “worked closely with officials at the White House's National Security Council and government agencies.” Hochstein was Obama’s point man on the energy situation in Ukraine. If Hochstein knew everything the Biden’s were doing, so did Obama. More proof of this comes from a series of meetings between prosecutors from Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and officials from Obama’s National Security Council, the FBI, the State Department, and the DOJ that took place in January 2016. The Ukrainian Embassy in Washington later “confirmed the Obama administration requested the meetings.” Present at these January 2016 meetings was Andrii Telizhenko, then an employee at the Ukrainian embassy. According to Telizhenko, a recurring theme at these meetings was “how important it was that all of our anti-corruption efforts be united.” Additionally, Telizhenko was told that U.S. officials “had an interest in reviving a closed investigation into payments to U.S. figures from Ukraine’s Russia-backed Party of Regions.” The focus of US officials was almost certainly Trump’s future Campaign Manager Paul Manafort. We know that “Agents interviewed Manafort in 2014 about whether he received undeclared payments” and “whether he engaged in improper foreign lobbying in Ukraine.” According to Telizhenko “DOJ officials asked investigators from Ukraine’s NABU if they could help locate new evidence about the Party of Regions’ payments and its dealings with Americans.” Trump’s soon-to-be campaign manager, Paul Manafort, would later be implicated in the Party of Regions payments, leading to his ultimate removal from the Trump Campaign. In January 2016, right at the time of the NABU’s meeting with Obama’s officials, Alexandra Chalupa, who had been investigating Manafort’s work in Ukraine, informed an unknown senior DNC official that she believed there was a Russian connection with the Trump campaign. This theme would be picked up by the Clinton campaign and the Intelligence Community in the summer of 2016 . Chalupa also told the official to expect Manafort’s involvement in the Trump campaign. How Chalupa knew this in advance has never been fully explained. NABU was established in October 2014 with assistance from the US government - led by a big push from vice-president Joe Biden and Victoria Nuland . In January 2016, NABU director Artem Sytnyk announced that his bureau was close to signing a Memorandum of cooperation with the FBI and by February 9th, the FBI had had a permanent representative onsite at the NABU offices . One week after the first FBI representative was installed at NABU, on February 18, 2016 - while Joe Biden was actively pushing for Shokin’s removal - authorities in Latvia flagged a series of ‘suspicious’ financial transactions linked to Hunter Biden, Devon Archer and two other unknown individuals involved with Burisma. It was later reported that “a series of loan payments totaling about $16.6 million that were routed from companies in Belize and the United Kingdom to Burisma through Ukraine’s PrivatBank between 2012 and 2015.” Latvian officials claimed that a portion of these funds were transferred to Hunter, Devon and the two unnamed individuals - one of whom was a US citizen. Despite requests for assistance, a Latvian official said his government received no criminal evidence from Ukraine and thus took no further action on the investigation. It seems implausible to us that the FBI, with its active presence within Ukraine’s anti-corruption offices, was not aware of these transactions - along with everything else the Bidens were doing. From the perspective of Obama and Biden, this situation with Latvian authorities needed to be fully contained before it exploded. Indeed, Shokin later said that it was this information that “made it impossible” to shut down his investigation of Burisma. Once Biden succeeded in getting Shokin officially fired on March 29, 2016, there was a new focus and a new directive for Biden —finding the proper replacement for Shokin. Despite Shokin's removal, the Burisma investigation was still technically open. Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko appointed Yuriy Sevruk as Shokin's replacement the same day as Shokin's firing. At this same time, Blue Star (hired by Burisma at Hunter's urging) began vetting Sevruk. It appears that Blue Star decided that Sevruk wasn’t the right person to wrap up all the investigations into Burisma. We know this because on May 12, 2016, Former Interior Minister Yuriy Lutsenko was suddenly appointed as Ukraine’s new prosecutor general - replacing Sevruk. The day after Lutsenko was appointed, Biden finally freed up the $1 billion funding to Ukraine that had been originally slated for November 2014 during a call with Poroshenko. This unexplained delay in funding is important because the Obama White House had been deeply involved in the funding of Ukraine from the very start. It seems totally implausible that Biden could simply delay $1 billion in funding that had been approved by Obama’s White House six months earlier without Obama’s sign off. On May 27, 2016, there was another call between Biden and Poroshenko (Hunter was inexplicably cc'd on the scheduling email). Three days later , on May 30, 2016, Lutsenko fired Sevruk. There was now an entirely new team at the prosecutor's office. Not so coincidentally, it was on this same day that groundwork for attacks on the Trump campaign really began. Fusion GPS’s Nellie Ohr, wife of DOJ official Bruce Ohr, sent an email to Bruce and three other DOJ officials disclosing the existence of the Ukraine Black Box that was later used to target Paul Manafort. No one outside of Ukraine knew of the Black Box - or Black Ledger as it was later known. Once Biden had finally sorted out the prosecutor situation in Ukraine, he needed to make sure his actions stayed hidden from public inquiry. All the more so because any serious investigation might ultimately shift towards Obama. Which made the ascending Trump Campaign a clear and present threat to Obama. Obama and Biden couldn't afford to have Trump poking around Ukraine as the new president. This helps to explain the sudden targeting of the Trump campaign in late spring 2016—just as Biden put the finishing touches on Shokin’s firing. This also explains the explosion of attacks on Trump once he became president. As we moved further into Trump’s presidency, it also explains the ferocious response from the DNC when Trump started to ask questions regarding Biden’s actions in Ukraine. If Trump was allowed to continue, he would have discovered all of the Biden misdeeds, Obama’s knowledge of everything, and perhaps other misdeeds from the others among the larger DC Establishment as well. Everything circles back to Ukraine. And Obama.By Sinéad Carew and Amanda Cooper NEW YORK/LONDON (Reuters) -The U.S dollar rose against some currencies after U.S. President-elect Donald Trump pledged to impose new tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico and China, while MSCI’s global equity index was higher after the release of the Federal Reserve’s latest meeting minutes. The minutes from the meeting earlier this month showed officials divided over how much farther they may need to cut interest rates, but in agreement about avoiding concrete guidance. “With the stock market, no surprises is good news. The market likes certainty above anything else,” said Burns McKinney, portfolio manager at NFJ Investment Group in Dallas. “Overall, Fed policymakers are still supportive of a careful approach. ... They didn’t say anything hawkish.” On Wall Street, at 3:11 p.m. (2011 GMT) the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 82.93 points, or 0.19%, to 44,819.50; the S&P 500 rose 26.92 points, or 0.45%, to 6,014.29; and the Nasdaq Composite rose 86.47 points, or 0.45%, to 19,141.31. By late afternoon MSCI’s gauge of stock markets across the globe had also turned higher and was up 0.71 point, or 0.08%, to 858.46. Europe’s STOXX 600 index earlier closed down 0.57%. While it was below its session high the dollar was still up against the Mexican peso and Canadian dollar in afternoon trading. Trump, citing concerns over illegal immigration and illicit drug trading, had said earlier that he would put a 25% tariff on products from Mexico and Canada, and an additional 10% tariff on goods from China. He had previously threatened to slap tariffs in excess of 60% on Chinese imports. But investors toned down their initial reactions to the tariff threat and appeared to view it as a “negotiation tool,” according to McKinney. However, U.S. Treasury yields rose on Tuesday, as Monday’s sharp bond rally lost momentum as the tariff announcement undid some of the investor optimism from Trump’s selection late last week of Scott Bessent as Treasury secretary. The yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notes rose 4.3 basis points to 4.306%, from 4.263% late on Monday while the 30-year bond yield rose 3.6 basis points to 4.4828%. The 2-year note yield, which typically moves in step with interest rate expectations, rose 0.6 basis point to 4.258%, from 4.252% late on Monday. In currencies, the Mexican peso weakened 1.69% versus the dollar and the Canadian dollar weakened 0.55% versus the greenback. While the euro was down 0.18% against the dollar at $1.0475, against the Japanese yen, the dollar weakened 0.73% to 153.08. Oil prices settled lower, slightly extending Monday’s losses in choppy trade after news of an agreement for a ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, reducing oil’s risk premium. U.S. crude settled down 0.25% at $68.77 a barrel and Brent ended at $72.81 per barrel, down 0.27% on the day. Bitcoin fell 2.06% to $91,758.00, adding to Monday’s losses after last week hitting a record high at $99,830. The token had benefited from speculation of an easier regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies under Trump. In precious metals, gold prices were caught in a tug-of-war, dipping to a week low as safe-haven demand softened with news of the ceasefire, while concern over Ukraine and Trump’s tariff plans added some support. Spot gold rose 0.18% to $2,629.86 an ounce while U.S. gold futures rose 0.34% to $2,625.60 an ounce. (Reporting by Amanda Cooper in London, Sinéad Carew in New York, Kevin Buckland in Tokyo and Ankur Banerjee in Singapore; Additional reporting by Stella Qiu; Editing by Bernadette Baum, Mark Potter and Jonathan Oatis) Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibilty for its content. var ytflag = 0;var myListener = function() {document.removeEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);lazyloadmyframes();};document.addEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {if (ytflag == 0) {lazyloadmyframes();ytflag = 1;}});function lazyloadmyframes() {var ytv = document.getElementsByClassName("klazyiframe");for (var i = 0; i < ytv.length; i++) {ytv[i].src = ytv[i].getAttribute('data-src');}} Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian made the decision in a written ruling following a bail hearing last week, when lawyers for the hip-hop mogul argued that a $50 million bail package they proposed would be sufficient to ensure Combs doesn’t flee and doesn’t try to intimidate prospective trial witnesses. Two other judges previously had been persuaded by prosecutors’ arguments that the Bad Boy Records founder was a danger to the community if he is not behind bars. Lawyers did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment on the decision. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to charges that he coerced and abused women for years, aided by associates and employees. An indictment alleges that he silenced victims through blackmail and violence, including kidnapping, arson and physical beatings. A federal appeals court judge last month denied Combs’ immediate release while a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan considers his bail request. Prosecutors have insisted that no bail conditions would be sufficient to protect the public and prevent the “I'll Be Missing You” singer from fleeing. They say that even in a federal lockup in Brooklyn, Combs has orchestrated social media campaigns designed to influence prospective jurors and tried to publicly leak materials he thinks can help his case. They say he also has contacted potential witnesses through third parties. Lawyers for Combs say any alleged sexual abuse described in the indictment occurred during consensual relations between adults and that new evidence refutes allegations that Combs used his “power and prestige” to induce female victims into drugged-up, elaborately produced sexual performances with male sex workers known as “Freak Offs.”

In the for your first home? Or seeking to add to your portfolio? or signup to continue reading Well, auctioneers are set to put two properties under the hammer this weekend in Bendigo. has been in the same family for 100 years and has now hit the market for new hands to take control. Given the family's history of housing show horses and trotters there is extensive shedding on the property. The block of land tops out at just over 1600 square-metres and includes a three-bedroom home with one bathroom. The home is also close to health facilities, nightlife venues and sporting clubs including AFL, soccer and lawn bowls. The house has been valued at around $500,000. The auction is scheduled for November 30 at 12pm. This home is set on a 700 square-metre block in the south of the city. The home is located close to schools, shops, and parks and is sitting on a block big enough to give the owners added privacy when needed. With both a front and back gardens available, potential owners will have the chance to flex their green thumbs and grow or create what they want to. There are also solar panels installed on the home which offers significant energy savings and sustainability. The house has been valued at between $430,000 and $470,000. The auction is scheduled for November 30 at 10:30am. WA boy in Bendigo, happy to be in Central Victoria. WA boy in Bendigo, happy to be in Central Victoria. DAILY Today's top stories curated by our news team. WEEKDAYS Grab a quick bite of today's latest news from around the region and the nation. WEEKLY The latest news, results & expert analysis. WEEKDAYS Catch up on the news of the day and unwind with great reading for your evening. WEEKLY Get the editor's insights: what's happening & why it matters. WEEKLY Love footy? We've got all the action covered. WEEKLY Every Saturday and Tuesday, explore destinations deals, tips & travel writing to transport you around the globe. WEEKLY Going out or staying in? Find out what's on. WEEKDAYS Sharp. Close to the ground. Digging deep. Your weekday morning newsletter on national affairs, politics and more. TWICE WEEKLY Your essential national news digest: all the big issues on Wednesday and great reading every Saturday. WEEKLY Get news, reviews and expert insights every Thursday from CarExpert, ACM's exclusive motoring partner. TWICE WEEKLY Get real, Australia! Let the ACM network's editors and journalists bring you news and views from all over. AS IT HAPPENS Be the first to know when news breaks. DAILY Your digital replica of Today's Paper. Ready to read from 5am! DAILY Test your skills with interactive crosswords, sudoku & trivia. Fresh daily!None

Nvidia has dominated the AI narrative in the stock market, captivating investors and the media after soaring 2,190% over the past five years and becoming the most valuable company in the world for a brief period (it's currently No. 2). However, Nvidia is far from the only opportunity in the AI or semiconductor space. In fact, one chipmaker just reported 400%-plus year-over-year data center revenue growth and overall revenue growth of 84% to $8.7 billion in its latest earnings report (for the quarter ending Nov. 28). I'm talking about Micron Technology ( MU 3.48% ) , the memory-chip specialist that is surprisingly down 44% from its recent peak, despite that blowout growth. That discount and its potential in AI make the stock an appealing buy right now. Let's review the company's recent results first and then get into the buy case. What is Micron? Micron is a leader in memory chips, including DRAM, NAND, and high bandwidth memory (HBM). The company is also an integrated device manufacturer, meaning it both designs and manufactures its own chips like Intel and Samsung do. Memory chips are a highly cyclical business, prone to price fluctuations and industry gluts, and owning its own foundries makes Micron more exposed to the boom and bust cycle in semiconductors. Running foundries requires a high level of capital, but the integrated business model allows the company to better capture margins when the business is performing well. The chart below, which shows Micron's price compared to its previous high, gives a sense of how volatile the stock has been. As you can see, over the last decade, the stock has fallen by 40% or more on four occasions before hitting a new all-time high. Data by YCharts. Cyclicality and volatility are part of the risk in investing in Micron, but there's no question the semiconductor sector is in a boom right now, driven by the explosive growth of AI, though some subsectors like PCs and smartphones are weaker. In addition to Nvidia's blowout growth, industry bellwether Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing recently reported revenue growth of 36% in the third quarter to $23.5 billion, showing strong growth in the sector. Noting strong AI demand, management said that data center revenue topped 50% of total revenue for the first time in the quarter, following a trail first blazed by Nvidia in the chip sector. That now makes the vast majority of Micron's revenue from the data center, where AI computing is taking place. Why Micron stock tumbled on the report After reporting fiscal first-quarter earnings on Wednesday, Micron stock plunged as much as 19% on Thursday on its weak second-quarter guidance. However, the company has a history of being conservative with its guidance, and the weakness was due to consumer markets like smartphones, whereas the AI business remains strong. HBM, the part of the business closely tied to AI, is seeing impressive growth. The company said it's on track to achieve its HBM target for the fiscal year and reach a "substantial record" in HBM revenue, including "significantly improved profitability, and free cash flow" in the fiscal year. Micron expects a sequential decline in revenue and adjusted earnings per share (EPS) in the second quarter, falling from $8.7 billion to $7.9 billion and for adjusted EPS to slip from $1.79 to $1.43. However, management's explanation for the weak outlook should reassure investors. CEO Sanjay Mehrotra said the company had warned previously that seasonality and customer inventory reductions in consumer-facing segments like smartphones would affect Q2 results. He added, "We are now seeing a more pronounced impact of customer inventory reductions," and continued, "We expect this adjustment period to be relatively brief and anticipate customer inventories reaching healthier levels by spring, enabling stronger bit shipments in the second half of fiscal and calendar 2025." In other words, the issues causing the weak second-quarter guidance look like just a speed bump for the company rather than a sustained headwind, and management expects to return to sequential growth in the second half of the year. For a stock to fall 17% on a one-time guidance cut feels like a misread by the market and a buying opportunity for investors. Why Micron is a no-brainer buy A sell-off driven by short-term news often presents a good buying opportunity, but there's more to Micron's buy case than that. Micron is clearly capitalizing on the AI boom with the surge in data center revenue, and with its largest customer, which is believed to be Nvidia, now making up 13% of its revenue. A close relationship with Nvidia is clearly a tailwind at this stage of the AI boom as Nvidia just reported 94% growth in year-over-year revenue in its Q3 report. Micron's results are notoriously lumpy and cyclical, but it has the ability to generate huge profits under the right circumstances -- and those seem to be shaping up as the AI boom plays out. For example, Micron expects the addressable market for HBM to jump from $16 billion in 2024 to $64 billion in 2028 and to $100 billion in 2030. Even if it just maintains its market share in that segment, its HBM revenue will be up 4x in four years and 6x and six years. Finally, Micron stock is also much cheaper than its AI and chip stock peers, trading at a forward P/E of just 10 based on this year's estimates. While those estimates are likely to come down after its guidance, Micron still looks like a bargain at any price near that. Micron investors should monitor the chip and AI cycle closely, but there's a lot of upside potential in the stock. Getting back to its peak this summer would mean a 75% jump for the stock, and shares could continue to rally further over the next year or two, especially if it continues to see strong growth in the data center. Micron is the rare AI stock that offers rapid growth and a good value right now.Perth Lord Mayor Basil Zempilas, WA Liberal leader Libby Mettam, Vice President Kamala Harris, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (Image: Private Media/AAP) Walz come tumbling down When Donald Trump romped to victory earlier this month, one of the Democratic campaigners Crikey spoke to explained the lack of protest rallies in the following days thus: “Our side is the one that accepts election results, remember?” This is certainly true of the institutional Democratic Party, but at an online call held yesterday between Kamala Harris, her VP nominee Tim Walz and their supporters, it was obviously not a unanimous position among party supporters. Harris’ address was nearly indistinguishable from the stump and concession speeches Crikey saw while we were in the US (is that a good sign?). Meanwhile, in the chat box, the vast majority of people were begging Harris to ask for a “forensic audit” of the vote, alongside hashtags like #ELONCHEATED and #RECOUNT. Comments in the online call’s chatbox (Image: Private Media) After the event wrapped up, the Democrats demonstrated their new clarity of purpose by sending out an invite to “NextGenE XYZ Virtual UnVoters 4 Women’s Rights Go Online To Vote”. “We are declaring this as the New Way Forward People’s Purple ShElection”, they inform us. Very cool! We think! Happy Junior FriYAY y’all! The relationship between public relations firms and journalists is strained at the best of times. So when PR firm Invigorate started spraying reporters with creepily cheery greetings like “Happy MonYAYYY!” ahead of pitches, newsrooms — famously filled with some of the world’s grumpiest people — around the country heaved a collective groan. As one reporter from the ABC told us, “‘Junior FriYAY’ [aka, Thursday] sent me. Absolutely wild way to try and court a journalist to talk about whatever random shit they’re hawking.” “I can’t tell if it’s a deliberate strategy to get people so irritated that they start a conversation, or if it’s genuinely someone who thinks people want to be told it’s Thursday like this, but it is wild.” Our call-out to try and determine how widespread these pitches are prompted a flood of responses, with 7:30 host Sarah Ferguson also confirming she receives the same emails. Some reporters told Crikey they had wondered whether the pitches were generated by AI. ‘Deeply repulsive’: ABC chair Kim Williams rails against Joe Rogan amid pitch for greater funding Read More It turns out Invigorate has quite the backstory. It’s run by Tess Sanders-Lazarus, wife of NRL legend and former Palmer United Party senator Glenn Lazarus. She was briefly in the political spotlight after PUP accused her of withholding keys to the party’s Canberra office following Lazarus’ defection in 2015. Sanders-Lazarus told Crikey (after shamelessly wishing us a “Happy TOOSYAYYY”), that the greetings were “designed to spread some cheer and to lift people”. She confirmed Invigorate’s use of AI was “limited at this stage”, but that the firm did partner with an agency that provided remote workers for its workforce. She also happily provided a full list of the greetings used by the firm for each day of the week: Happy Groundhog Day / Happy MonYAYYYY Happy TOOSSSYAY Happy HUMP day Happy Junior FriYAYYYY Happy FriYAYYYY Sod our statues During the week, a tipster pointed out that Ray Bramham Park’s “Lebanese Immigrant” statue — a “homage” to the local Lebanese community — in Preston, Victoria, had been stolen, the traditionally attired figure lopped off at the ankles: (IMage: Supplied) “The act of stealing this statue is not merely an offence against a piece of art, but a violation of the identity, history and culture of an entire community and an insult to the sacrifices of thousands of Lebanese who were compelled to emigrate,” the World Lebanese Cultural Union said in a statement . “A thorough investigation is essential to identify the perpetrators, hold them accountable, and restore this important symbol to its rightful place in the community.” And yet, not a word in Australia’s media or from the political class: no ministers saying the vandals were “ trashing our national heritage “, no commenters calling the defacing or removal of statues Stalinist, Maoist and Talibanesque . Which is a notable shift in tone, even if you believe the act has more to do with the raw value of the materials than the conflict in the Middle East. Mettam? I hardly know ’em! The Liberal Party of Western Australia continues to be a kind of Tardis of farce, containing caverns of dysfunction quite unimaginable when one looks at its size. The latest farrago concerns “Liberal polling” commissioned by an “unnamed businessman”, run exclusively in The West Australian this week. It predicted an “election wipeout” unless leader Libby Mettam stood down in favour of Basil Zempilas. There is so very much to unpack here. The polling predicted a wipeout compared to what the Liberals currently have: three lower house MPs (an improvement on the two they had after the McGowan Mania of 2021). Second, an eagle-eyed WA politics watcher might note Zempilas is Perth’s lord mayor, not a state member of Parliament. Voters know the benefits of migration and want cuts anyway. And they’ll get what they want Read More And let’s round it off by noting the sheer Perth-posterousness of this cluster of power and influence: mysteriously sourced polling favouring an unelected party leader, run unquestioningly in the state’s only daily newspaper, which in turn is owned by Zempilas’ employers at Seven West Media, a conflict of interest so brazen people have pretty much stopped commenting on it. Adding to the intrigue is the claim from shadow police minister Peter Collier, that a male federal Liberal candidate arranged for the “unnamed businessman” to do the polling in the first place. Mettam stared the saga down yesterday, inviting her colleagues to move a motion of no confidence. No one did, and the sixth change of leadership for the party since 2017 was delayed. Making the LinkedIn Finally, we must offer our respect to LinkedIn. In the midst of a week where talk about social media has drifted into the impractical and the poorly evidenced, it has maintained a steadfast commitment to realism. As noted by Crikey ‘s Cam Wilson , LinkedIn has argued in its submission to the inquiry into a social media ban for under-16s that it should be exempt because it is far too boring to pose any kind of risk to anyone in that demographic, concluding: “LinkedIn simply does not have content interesting and appealing to minors.”

Lions CBs Terrion Arnold, Ennis Rakestraw Jr. out vs. Colts

HONOLULU (AP) — KyeRon Lindsay and Terence Harcum each scored 16 points as Murray State beat Loyola Chicago 71-68 on Wednesday for seventh place at the Diamond Head Classic. Lindsay also had five rebounds and four steals for the Racers (7-6). Harcum went 5 of 10 from the floor, including 2 for 6 from 3-point range, and 4 for 6 from the line. AJ Ferguson shot 4 of 8 from the field and 2 for 4 from the line to finish with 11 points. The Ramblers (9-4) were led by Miles Rubin, who posted 16 points and three blocks. Des Watson added 12 points and Sheldon Edwards had 10 points. Lindsay scored eight points in the first half and Murray State went into halftime trailing 36-34. Harcum led the way with 10 second-half points. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by and data from .

Why Woodward Rallied Today

Iowa cornerback Jermari Harris has opted out of the remainder of the 2024 season in order to prepare for the NFL draft, according to a report by 247Sports.com . The 6-foot-1 sixth-year senior from Chicago has recorded 27 tackles, three interceptions and a team-high seven pass breakups in 10 games for the Hawkeyes this season. That includes a pick-6 in a 38-21 win over Troy earlier this season. Iowa (6-4, 4-3 Big Ten) plays at Maryland on Saturday before closing out its regular season at home against Nebraska on Nov. 29. The Hawkeyes are already bowl eligible, so Harris is likely opting out of three games in total. After missing the entire 2022 season due to an ankle injury, Harris was suspended for two games of the following season for his involvement in the gambling investigation into Iowa athletics. He later emerged as the Hawkeyes' top cornerback, earning the team's comeback player of the year award after compiling 42 tackles, one interception and eight pass breakups. Harris will finish his college career with 105 tackles and eight interceptions. --Field Level Media

Hail Flutie: BC celebrates 40th anniversary of Miracle in Miami