By Madhu Hebbar
Since 2001, Islamic countries, including Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Pakistan, have donated billions to U.S. universities, raising concerns about their influence on academic narratives, particularly antisemitism, Hinduphobia, and portrayals of Hindutva as fascist. Reports from the National Association of Scholars (NAS) and the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy (ISGAP) document financial flows and their impact, while critics argue these funds support education. Pakistan’s role, though less quantified, amplifies anti-India and anti-Hindu narratives, complementing larger donors. This article explores the data and implications.
Qatar leads, contributing $4.7–6 billion (2001–2021), per NAS and 2025 estimates, to universities like Cornell ($1.95 billion), Georgetown ($760 million), Northwestern ($600 million), Texas A&M ($522 million), and Carnegie Mellon ($740 million). Funds, often via the Qatar Foundation, support satellite campuses but are sometimes unreported, evading Higher Education Act requirements. Saudi Arabia donated ~$3.5 billion, funding Islamic studies at Harvard (over $900 million) and Georgetown ($100 million). The UAE provided $1.1 billion, notably $600 million for NYU Abu Dhabi. Kuwait ($700 million) supported programs at Harvard and Columbia, while Turkey ($500 million), Oman ($200 million), and Bahrain (~$100 million) funded smaller initiatives. Malaysia and Indonesia contributed under $50 million. A 2020 U.S. Department of Education (DoE) investigation found $6.5 billion in unreported funds, with Qatar and Saudi Arabia as major contributors, and ~200 universities concealing $13 billion total.
Pakistan’s contributions are less documented but significant in context. While exact figures are scarce, posts on X and reports suggest Pakistan has funded academic programs, particularly in South Asian and Middle East studies, to cultivate influence. A 2015 RAND report notes Pakistan’s strategic investments in U.S. academia to shape narratives, often aligning with its anti-India stance. Estimates suggest contributions in the tens of millions, likely through government-linked foundations or diaspora organizations, targeting universities like Columbia and NYU for Pakistan studies programs.
Influence on Academic Narratives
The funding correlates with shifts in campus climates, particularly antisemitism, Hinduphobia, and Hindutva portrayals. ISGAP (2020–2023) found that universities receiving Qatar and Saudi funds reported 250% more antisemitic incidents (2015–2020), with groups like Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) thriving post-funding. Qatar’s Hamas ties and Saudi Arabia’s anti-Israel narratives influence programs like Georgetown’s Alwaleed Center, which is criticized for one-sided Palestinian advocacy.
Hinduphobia has surged, with Hindu students facing stereotyping as caste oppressors or extremists. HAF (2023) documented bias in curricula and protests, like at Rutgers (2021), where SJP-linked groups labeled Hindu festivals oppressive. Qatar’s Qatar Foundation International (QFI), funding ~8,000 schools, introduces anti-Hindu content, while Al Jazeera (collaborating with Northwestern) amplifies Hinduphobia narratives.
The portrayal of Hindutva as fascist has intensified since India’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) rose to power in New Delhi in 2014. Conferences like “Dismantling Global Hindutva” (2021) at UPenn and Rutgers equated Hindutva with Nazism, ignoring its cultural roots. ISGAP (2024) notes that 70% of South Asian studies programs at funded universities receive Islamic grants, with Qatar and Saudi-backed faculty framing Hindutva as anti-Muslim. Georgetown and Columbia host events critical of India’s Kashmir policies, amplifying these views. HAF (2024) reports that 40% of Hindu students at such institutions feel unsafe.
Pakistan’s Role augments this narrative. Pakistan’s education system, as noted in a 2011 USCIRF report, fosters anti-Hindu prejudice, portraying Hindus as India’s “arch enemy” and unpatriotic. This rhetoric extends to U.S. academia through Pakistan-funded programs. For example, Columbia’s South Asia Institute, which receives grants from Pakistan-linked entities, has hosted talks emphasizing India’s alleged Hindu nationalist aggression in Kashmir, often without context about Pakistan’s role. A 2022 Rutgers report on anti-Hindu disinformation found Iranian and Pakistani trolls disseminating anti-Hindu stereotypes online, influencing campus activism. Pakistan’s geopolitical rivalry with India, including its support for anti-India lobbying in the U.S., aligns with Qatar’s anti-India stances, reinforcing narratives that vilify Hindutva and Hinduism.
Mechanisms of Influence
Qatar’s $500 billion to $1 trillion sovereign wealth fund, tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, fosters anti-Hindu and anti-Israel sentiments, countering India and Israel geopolitically. Saudi Arabia’s declining but historically Wahhabi-influenced funding critiques non-Abrahamic faiths. The UAE and Turkey align with anti-India stances, like Turkey’s Kashmir critiques. Pakistan leverages its diaspora and government-linked entities to fund chairs and events that emphasize India’s Hindu nationalism as a regional threat, often ignoring Hindu persecution in Pakistan. Opaque funding, via intermediaries like the Qatar Foundation or Pakistan’s Higher Education Commission, obscures influence.
The Bridge Initiative, a Georgetown University project under the Saudi-funded Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, has drawn scrutiny for promoting Hinduphobia. Backed by a $20 million donation from Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal in 2005, the initiative focuses on documenting Islamophobia but is criticized for biased portrayals of Hindu organizations. Reports like its 2023 factsheet on the Coalition of Hindus of North America (CoHNA) frame Hindu advocacy, such as support for India’s Citizenship Amendment Act, as Islamophobic or tied to Hindu nationalism, fueling anti-Hindu stereotypes.
Hindu American Foundation (HAF) and posts on X highlight the initiative’s collaboration with figures like Raqib Naik, accusing it of equating Hindutva with extremism without engaging Hindu perspectives. HAF’s 2021 rebuttal to a Bridge factsheet noted factual inaccuracies, underscoring tensions. While the initiative denies promoting Hinduphobia, its Saudi funding and selective focus raise concerns about its role in shaping anti-Hindu academic narratives, mirroring broader issues with Islamic funding transparency.
Limitations
Data is incomplete due to lax pre-2020 reporting, with Pakistan’s contributions particularly underreported. Correlations don’t prove causation; domestic activism may drive narratives. Evidence of explicit control is anecdotal, and Hindutva critiques may reflect legitimate concerns, though funding may amplify biases.
Recent Developments
The DETERRENT Act (2023) seeks transparency, while lawsuits (2025) demand DoE disclosures. Texas A&M (2024) closed its Qatar campus, and Northwestern reviews Qatar ties. Hindu groups like HAF advocate against Hinduphobia, urging curriculum audits. At UC Berkeley (2025), students protested Qatar-funded lectures for anti-Hindutva bias.
Conclusion
Islamic funding, led by Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, to U.S. universities correlates with increased antisemitism, Hinduphobia, and misrepresentations of Hindutva as fascist. These funds, often opaque, influence academic narratives, with Pakistan amplifying anti-India rhetoric. While supporters claim educational benefits, unreported billions raise transparency concerns. Recent measures like the DETERRENT Act and campus closures signal scrutiny, but universities must enforce reporting, audit curricula, and protect Jewish and Hindu students to ensure academic integrity and inclusivity.
About the Author
Madhu Hebbar, an engineer, is an IIT graduate, living in the greater Los Angeles area. He is a practicing Hindu and an avid reader who is interested in Eastern philosophies and their general application to Western challenges. He is engaged in coaching youngsters interested in Hindu civilizational history, universal values, and their modern-day relevance. He has contributed to many intellectual engagements for a decade-plus in the Hindu community across the U.S. He is a keen student /observer of the media, trying to understand motives, narratives, and their impact on people and society.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Voice of Hindus. Any content provided by our contributors or authors is their opinion.
About Author
